Man Denied Gun Permit Will Take Case to N.H. Supreme Court

[Lady Di]

People just aren't going to take it anymore. Go get 'em mister!

http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071101/NEWS/71101010

[VegasGeorge]

I was solidly in this fellow's corner until I got to the part about him leaving copies of his CCW permit on coworkers' desks. What is that all about? I don't know if that behavior rises to a level that would justify denial of a permit. But it is definately inappropriate, and I can see where it would be considered threatening under the right circumstances.

This case brought a question to mind. What is the rationale for requiring a CCW at all in a State that allows open carry without a permit? As far as public safety is concerned, does it make a difference if someone is carrying openly or concealed? I doubt it.

[Bill of Rights]

I questioned that, too. If it's reported correctly, which is anyone's guess, yes, I would say he acted irresponsibly, but while I don't condone that action if indeed it was an intended, unspoken threat, irresponsible behavior is not grounds to deny someone his rights, else the majority of those running for public office, specifically the presidency, would be denied the right of free speech and free press.

Why is a permit required for CCW if OC is legal without a permit? I'm reminded of your recent question of how we came to the point that the states are picking and choosing what parts of the Constitution they wish to honor, but If I was guessing, I'd say that it hearkens back to when concealed carry was considered to be underhanded and unbefitting a gentleman, who if he carried, carried openly. In other words, it's outdated and belongs in the same category as the proverbial "spitting on the sidewalk" law.

Just a guess.

Cogito, ergo porto.

Blessings,
M